TEN YEARS AFTER/STONEDHENGE UK MONO DML 1029 VS. STEREO SML 1029

Since I first saw the sleeve notes about a couple of slight differences in effects between stereo and mono (see below) I've been curious if that was all or if any of the cuts also were mixed differently, but for some reason never got myself together for a comparison...till now that is. Haven't dug deep, just connecting the channels on the stereo to check the balance against the mono. And there are differences in volume and balance. Mono keeps the same dynamics and volume all through while the connected stereo shifts between songs - dynamics going from mono-like to slightly unbalanced or flat and volume on the mono is higher throughout. In all mono sounds much roomier than a would-be fold, having a more generous atmosphere. That together with the sleeve noted variations at least convince me this mono is separate. Not the most methodical or exhaustive scrutiny...I know, just enough to be sure. Anyone knows more hard facts on this matter please comment and tell. (MÅW*) (CPYC*) (XYÄ*) (DÄRR*)